EU AI Act Transparency Disclosure Generator
From 2 August 2026, Article 50 requires disclosure in four situations, and between them they catch most businesses putting AI in front of people in the EU. A system that interacts directly with people must make clear it is a machine; synthetic audio, image, video and text must carry a machine-readable mark; people exposed to emotion recognition or biometric categorisation must be told; and deepfakes, along with AI-written text published to inform the public on matters of public interest, must be disclosed. This free generator produces the wording for each situation that applies to you, ready to paste into your interface, and tells you plainly which parts of Article 50 a text disclosure cannot solve.
10 FREE DOCUMENTS · RUNS IN YOUR BROWSER · NOTHING UPLOADED
Your details carry over — no re-typing
EU Withdrawal Function
Article 11a two-step withdrawal form, email and policy line.
Open tool →PPWR Declaration of Conformity
Packaging DoC structured per Annex VIII of Regulation (EU) 2025/40.
Open tool →EU Declaration of Conformity
The CE-marking DoC per Decision 768/2008/EC Annex III.
Open tool →Article 50, answered in full
When exactly does this start applying?
Article 50 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 applies from 2 August 2026. There is one carve-out: providers of generative AI systems already placed on the EU market before that date have until 2 December 2026 to bring their machine-readable marking into conformity with Article 50(2). Every other Article 50 obligation — chatbot disclosure, deepfake labelling, AI-generated public-interest text — applies from 2 August without a transition. Content generated before 2 August does not have to be labelled retroactively.
Why does this tool not produce the machine-readable marking?
Because a text generator cannot. Article 50(2) requires synthetic audio, image, video and text to be marked in a machine-readable format and detectable as artificially generated — a watermarking and content-provenance problem that has to be solved inside the pipeline that produces the content, using techniques such as embedded provenance metadata. The Commission's Code of Practice on transparency of AI-generated content, published 10 June 2026, addresses exactly this. What this tool does produce is the human-readable side of Article 50: the notices under 50(1), 50(3) and 50(4) that a person actually reads.
Does the chatbot disclosure always apply?
Article 50(1) applies to AI systems intended to interact directly with natural persons, and the obligation falls away where it is obvious to a reasonably well-informed person that they are dealing with an AI. "Obvious" is doing a lot of work in that sentence and the Commission's draft guidelines of 8 May 2026 address the scope. In practice, if there is any doubt about whether your interface reads as clearly machine-operated, disclosing costs nothing and removes the question.
What are the penalties?
Non-compliance with the transparency obligations can reach €15 million or 3% of total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher. Enforcement sits with national market surveillance authorities. The obligations apply regardless of where the provider is established — a business outside the EU placing an AI system on the EU market is in scope.
Is this legal advice?
No. This is a drafting aid that renders the structure of Article 50 into wording you can adapt. Whether a particular system falls within Article 50 at all, and which of the four situations it lands in, is a legal question about your system and your use of it. Verify against the official text and the Commission's guidelines, and take advice where the answer is not obvious.